Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31856 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2006 13:23:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Jun 2006 13:23:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 596 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2006 13:23:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 433 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jun 2006 13:23:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 424 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jun 2006 13:23:48 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 06:23:48 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 06:23:46 -0700 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=talk.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1FpmO4-0003AV-UM for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 06:23:25 -0700 Message-ID: <4828608.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 06:23:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Swindells To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [Un]reliable:// network of AMQ brokers with Lingo In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-Sender: tswindells@ndsuk.com X-Nabble-From: Thomas Swindells References: <4742177.post@talk.nabble.com> <4754823.post@talk.nabble.com> <4756297.post@talk.nabble.com> <4756929.post@talk.nabble.com> <4757892.post@talk.nabble.com> <4759834.post@talk.nabble.com> <4762360.post@talk.nabble.com> <44883BA7.7000205@ldsys.net> <4828428.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N James.Strachan wrote: > > On 6/12/06, Thomas Swindells wrote: >> James.Strachan wrote: >> What happens if the slave and a client hiccups and thinks the master has >> failed? > > If the slave and the clients think the master is down then failover to > the slave will occur. > > Note that both the clients and the slave must think the master is > down. e.g. if the clients think the master is down but the slave can > still see the master, then the clients will not be able to connect to > the slave (as it doesn't allow connections until the master has failed > over), so they will reconnect to the master again. > Presumably a problem would occour on (say) a 2 host system set up as A[master + clientA] and B[slave+clientB] in this situation if there is a network hiccup between the two hosts would you end up with with a bipartite system - A and B totally seperate not talking to each other? Thomas -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Un-reliable%3A---network-of-AMQ-brokers-with-Lingo-t1744760.html#a4828608 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.