activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Strachan" <james.strac...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: list transport with vm
Date Thu, 22 Jun 2006 09:18:30 GMT
sounds like a bug - I wonder do you get the same issue in 4.0?

On 6/21/06, jerb <jerb@bluenotenetworks.com> wrote:
>
> I'm using 3.2 and I get different behavior when creating a connection using
> transport url - "list:(vm://brokername)" than when using "vm://brokername".
> The difference appears to be that the former always creates a new embedded
> broker while the latter will reuse an existing broker. The result is that
> clients intending to use "vm://brokername" as the transport won't be able to
> transmit messages to eachother if one of them was configured in  a list.
> Looking at the code, the reason appears to be that the
> ActiveMQConnectionFactory looks into the brokerContext to check for an
> existing broker connector, while the CompositeTransportChannel does not.
> Why the difference in behavior?
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/list-transport-with-vm-t1823631.html#a4973427
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Mime
View raw message