activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Swindells <tswinde...@ndsuk.com>
Subject Re: [Un]reliable:// network of AMQ brokers with Lingo
Date Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:13:20 GMT


James.Strachan wrote:
> 
> On 6/8/06, Christopher G. Stach II <cgs@ldsys.net> wrote:
>> James Strachan wrote:
>> > Note that the client side reliable:// in AMQ3 and failover:// in AMQ4
>> > (BTW it was renamed in 4 to make it explicit what it does - failover
>> > to a new connection, thats all) -purely does client side reconnection
>> > - it does not implement HA clustering where messages are replicated to
>> > multiple brokers in case one fails and you loose the disk; only
>> > Master/Slave does that - which is a broker-side configuration.
>> >
>> > Though store/forward and Master/Slave depends on the client using
>> failover.
>>
>> What happens when a client hiccups and does failover to the slave, but
>> all of the other clients are still using the master?
> 
> The slave doesn't accept new connections  until the master fails.
> 
What happens if the slave and a client hiccups and thinks the master has
failed? 

Thomas
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Un-reliable%3A---network-of-AMQ-brokers-with-Lingo-t1744760.html#a4828428
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message