Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18726 invoked from network); 5 May 2006 15:56:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 May 2006 15:56:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 24049 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2006 15:56:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 24033 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2006 15:56:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 24023 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2006 15:56:31 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 May 2006 08:56:31 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [66.100.65.198] (HELO BUTTHEAD.daxtechnologies.com) (66.100.65.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 May 2006 08:56:30 -0700 Received: from BEAVIS.daxtechnologies.com ([192.168.0.1]) by BUTTHEAD.daxtechnologies.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 5 May 2006 11:56:11 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.34] ([192.168.0.34]) by BEAVIS.daxtechnologies.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 5 May 2006 11:56:11 -0400 Message-ID: <445B7599.8080304@daxtechnologies.com> Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 11:56:09 -0400 From: Adrian Tarau User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060214) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Queue and the messages priority Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 May 2006 15:56:11.0301 (UTC) FILETIME=[6E180D50:01C6705C] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N There was any change in handling messages priority between 3.2.x and 4.0? After I upgraded to 4.0 the queue seems to be processed in the the same order as the messages was produced and not based in priority. This I noticed also when consuming also dumping the messages with QueueBrowser - I don't know if the a queue browser should retrieve the items in the same order as when consuming, but seems to be the logical way of doing browsing. During browsing I have messages with priority 9 in the middle of the queue and also at the end - at the end of the iterations.