activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Charles Anthony <charles.anth...@hpdsoftware.com>
Subject RE: Which version of ActiveMQ to use ?
Date Wed, 10 May 2006 16:23:28 GMT
FWIW, I've managed to get our app to work with 4.0.

I had to use the 4.0-soon-to-be-released build, as opposed to 4.0-RC3, since
I got bitten by  https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-696 straight
away.

The update will probably be delivered to our developers and testers
tomorrow, and shared with our clients for system testing by the end of the
week.

Cheers,

Charles.

-----Original Message-----
From: James Strachan [mailto:james.strachan@gmail.com]
Sent: 10 May 2006 13:28
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Which version of ActiveMQ to use ?


I'd ignore 3.x  and head straight for 4.0; its very stable. You can
try the 4.0 build which will be voted on soon

http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0/maven1/incubator-ac
tivemq/distributions/

or failing that try 4.0-RC3.

On 5/10/06, Charles Anthony <charles.anthony@hpdsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> We currently have several live installations which use ActiveMQ 2.1 - (yes
> 2.1, no typo)
>
> Our needs are currently very simple - a single ActiveMQ server, no
> clustering, no persistency, no fail-over, no nothing. (Some of those
things
> would be very handy, but haven't got around to attempting to implement
them
> yet).
>
> We have been getting intermittent ConcurrentModification errors from the
> bowels of AMQ when sending messages - we've been  sort of tap danced
around
> them, since they've been so intermittent (like, once every 2 months).
>
> They've been becoming more frequent, though, so it's now Time To Do
> Something About It.
>
> The obvious thing to do is to move to a later release of AMQ - but the
> question is, Which ?
>
> So, should it be 3.2.2 - the last official release - or the latest 4.0 RC
?
> Is the RC stable ?
>
> I don't think the answer to this question is quite as obvious as it may
> appear... but then I'm happy to be wrong !
>
> Cheers,
>
> Charles.
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> HPD Software Ltd. - Helping Business Finance Business
> Email terms and conditions: www.hpdsoftware.com/disclaimer
>
>
>


--

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/


___________________________________________________________
HPD Software Ltd. - Helping Business Finance Business
Email terms and conditions: www.hpdsoftware.com/disclaimer 



Mime
View raw message