Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11054 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2006 14:03:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 2006 14:03:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 14530 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2006 14:03:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 14399 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2006 14:03:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 14389 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2006 14:03:08 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:03:08 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.172] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.92.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:03:07 -0700 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m3so358695ugc for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:02:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SyqOkS1gcw5Me/qOhyHBYR7SEcLtoIrTrcnmtJVuFS8tJgSEttEd5iSMVlxhosPuF+fIVEpH8WEvuRUj+1HWcv/eD+0qvInkybnkynZqLJHdD8XLF7NS4DQZ3Caakzw5T4v+laW+WPFf+mZb9ZngExsTtFBZwp/LesRyUhIGvEo= Received: by 10.78.43.1 with SMTP id q1mr90382huq; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:02:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.27.13 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:02:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:02:46 +0100 From: "James Strachan" To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Purging Obsolete Persistent Messages In-Reply-To: <4026814.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4017659.post@talk.nabble.com> <4026814.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 4/21/06, vlv wrote: > I should have mentioned that this is a queue on version 3.2.1. We do inde= ed > need to swich to 4.x at least for master/slave and jmx support. But we wo= n't > have time for that for a few months. > > Yeah, we have two brokers in a cluster, each servicing a queue with the s= ame > name, and they are in the reliable config for each other. One queue's tab= le > has around 180 messages and the other has around 220. We see those values > rise and fall a bit, but the tables never go empty, and we don't see any > listeners receiving messages. So they seem to be stuck.... ??? In 3.x messages could end up getting sat on a queue when using 2 brokers in a network as a cluster; we've added masters/slave in 4.x to fix this common use case. Also if you are using networks in 4.x we've much more options for controlling how demand is managed and how the network operates etc. -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/