Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41667 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2006 16:19:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2006 16:19:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 11909 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2006 16:19:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 11893 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2006 16:19:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 11884 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2006 16:19:20 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 09:19:20 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.206 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.206] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.92.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 09:19:19 -0700 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m3so904341ugc for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 09:18:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eM8YpvCuAJ7Vh00LOqqcGgOIFqPbH7Zj7o6jRSfkp9vCRiJt3wcA1HKzq8yaVA1BSj9Cx6QnIxW4oyDPXK/HteyOQzrjrWhs8kGg28Aqg7tj0tHPjpyAg6rAg0QI/RKSh1gEEGYECcYuwqEgqs0QyY6xlhfOxjkE+SG2FG9rL9w= Received: by 10.78.18.3 with SMTP id 3mr176055hur; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 09:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.27.13 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 17:18:58 +0100 From: "James Strachan" To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Using UDP for Connector In-Reply-To: <3747483.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <3747483.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Just out of interest, why do you want to use UDP? We have a UDP transport now in 4.0-RC1 or 4.0-RC2; though be aware UDP is unreliable; we've not yet got the unit tests working for re-requesting dropped datagrams etc. James On 4/4/06, toolpusher wrote: > > Hello, > We are trying to have the consumer connect to the broker via UDP to > consume messages that have been put on a Q via TCP. > At 4.0 I am unable to connect with UDP at all and I get this message: > Transport scheme NOT recognized: [udp] > > When I try to add: > discoveryUri=3D"multicast://default"/> > > to the TRANSPORTCONNECTORS section of activemq.xml, I get a > Transport scheme NOT recognized: [udp] > message while starting up the broker. > > We tried v3.2.2 and failed as well. The problems there are different. > I modified the activemq.xml and activemq.dtd to add > a CONNECTOR > > Though this allowed me to startup the broker I am unable to consume messa= ges > that have been put on the Q by a UDP producer and strangely I get a > bindexception. > > Any help would be appreciated. > Thanks. > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Using-UDP-for-Connect= or-t1393978.html#a3747483 > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com. > > -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/