Return-Path: 
 <activemq-users-return-431-apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 3387 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2006 07:10:40 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2006 07:10:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 73256 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2006 07:10:40 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 73240 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2006 07:10:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:activemq-users-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Id: <activemq-users.geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 73231 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2006 07:10:40 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:10:40 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.92.205 as permitted sender)
Received: from [66.249.92.205] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.92.205)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:10:39 -0700
Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m3so840634ugc
        for <activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org>;
 Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:10:17 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=n8UNqe90OpQIr5Zrldqt7Q9LwmIyasaiI2vMUx/9rNfRkFSHZP5cGE7lXbIMk4tOEtI47pxyt8FQfFCyPtf3SLjNG6uyQYPVpdsF3ZXIlEi5fcmUTCC9I7OQBKB6uQ0dwu0eoFG+L0Kgynrwm7okICs3xOtPpoXpB9Hv+tvVTpg=
Received: by 10.78.29.13 with SMTP id c13mr156533huc;
        Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:10:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.27.13 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 00:10:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <ec6e67fd0604040010g358058f0ye389933c7f0e8dc6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 08:10:17 +0100
From: "James Strachan" <james.strachan@gmail.com>
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Broker config
In-Reply-To: <3739257.post@talk.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3739257.post@talk.nabble.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On 4/4/06, Naby <user_is@abwesend.de> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> We are running ActiveMQ RC1 with Java1.5 and the default configuration on=
 an
> Linux system now. It is used by about 50 clients with about 100-150
> non-durable non-persistent topics at the same time.
>
> Can someone recommend an broker configuration to me?

The default configuration should work well for this architecture. If
you explicitly want to disable all persistence, you could set the
persistent flag to false in the <broker> tag. Other than that I think
you're done.

A single broker should be able to deal with the load of 50 clients; if
you really want you could run 2 brokers in a network then let clients
use the failover: protocol to connect to either one so that if one
broker fails, clients will failover to the other one.
http://activemq.org/Networks+of+Brokers

--

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/