Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25552 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2006 10:16:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Apr 2006 10:16:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 767 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2006 10:16:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 735 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2006 10:16:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 726 invoked by uid 99); 18 Apr 2006 10:16:09 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 03:16:09 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 03:16:07 -0700 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=talk.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1FVnFI-0001Qq-EH for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 03:15:46 -0700 Message-ID: <3965410.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 03:15:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Kuppe To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Diffs between pub/sub test in windows and linux MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-Sender: kuppe@360t.com X-Nabble-From: Kuppe X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I am running a simple command-line driven pub/sub test where the broker is in the same VM as the publisher and subscriber, just in different threads. Surprisingly, when i run the test on a windows notebook, i get pretty good results: 1000 messages of 10 bytes each in 1051ms but when i run the exact same test on a linux box which is much more powerful than the windows notebook, i get completely different results: 1000 messages of 10 bytes each in 80696ms Can you suggest what could be different between the two environments that could cause such variances? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Diffs-between-pub-sub-test-in-windows-and-linux-t1467236.html#a3965410 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.