Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37564 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2006 19:16:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Apr 2006 19:16:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 87536 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2006 19:16:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 87517 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2006 19:16:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 87508 invoked by uid 99); 17 Apr 2006 19:16:26 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:16:26 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:16:26 -0700 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=talk.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1FVZCf-0004qA-EG for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:16:05 -0700 Message-ID: <3955872.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:16:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevro To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Channel was inactive for too long In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-Sender: activemq@turnsignalfluid.com X-Nabble-From: Kevro References: <3954467.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi Hiram, Thanks for the response. The client is using the activemq-4.0-RC2.jar that I copied from the root of the binary distribution, and following is a listing of the ActiveMQ lib dir (no changes). I noticed that there is no activemq-4.0-RC2.jar in the lib dir, but there is an activemq-core-4.0-RC2.jar. Should the broker's classpath also include the non-core JAR? $ ls -1R .: activeio-core-3.0-beta1.jar activemq-console-4.0-RC2.jar activemq-core-4.0-RC2.jar backport-util-concurrent-2.1.jar commons-logging-1.0.3.jar geronimo-j2ee-management_1.0_spec-1.0.jar geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar mx4j-2.1.1.jar optional ./optional: activecluster-4.0-RC2.jar activemq-optional-4.0-RC2.jar activemq-ra-4.0-RC2.rar commons-beanutils-1.6.1.jar commons-collections-2.1.jar commons-dbcp-1.2.jar commons-httpclient-2.0.1.jar commons-pool-1.2.jar derby-10.1.1.0.jar geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-1.0.jar geronimo-j2ee-jacc_1.0_spec-1.0.jar jetty-6.0.0beta12.jar log4j-1.2.12.jar mx4j-remote-2.1.1.jar mx4j-tools-2.1.1.jar servlet-api-2.5-6.0.0beta6.jar spring-1.2.4.jar xbean-spring-2.2.jar xmlpull-1.1.3.4d_b4_min.jar xstream-1.1.2.jar -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Channel-was-inactive-for-too-long-t1463069.html#a3955872 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.