Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84398 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2006 14:48:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2006 14:48:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 33978 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2006 14:48:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 33849 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2006 14:48:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 33840 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2006 14:48:02 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 07:48:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 07:48:00 -0700 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=talk.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1FQmoj-0001Sp-Ht for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 07:47:38 -0700 Message-ID: <3745763.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 07:47:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Kessler To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: ConcurrentModificationException In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-Sender: kkessler@ameritrade.com X-Nabble-From: Kevin Kessler References: <3731128.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N It was the M4 release that didn't have a synchronized dispatchMatched() method. I checked the current SNAPSHOT, and the synchronized block was there. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ConcurrentModificationException-t1388611.html#a3745763 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.