Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of xleyba@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.202 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=UeW7VsWlNnUsfikbxGeTc48oKX7wGcMZ3obPQljK+1Pz3DrCOO910CONgeF2FIk9lWYL7oN/gbkQSg054XlxikvMnnk64bfjPEy3cCKOWpcYnr2DMm3qRDBoTqXZ+GnlhoW7u83vtt7W/TjMj4FJc7X89SAeFHbErSrP/jICklI=
Message-ID: <933f2a180603210400r5d524590mb9c163964b8fe445@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:00:48 +0100
From: "Javier Leyba" <xleyba@gmail.com>
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Architecture doubt
In-Reply-To: <ec6e67fd0603210351n5e3ec655o76c47173e681be84@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <933f2a180603210045x35afef8fi2203fa6fa3afd631@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ec6e67fd0603210351n5e3ec655o76c47173e681be84@mail.gmail.com>

Sorry, but I forgot to tell you my clients will be 100% consumers except on=
e.

J


On 3/21/06, James Strachan <james.strachan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Absolutely; you should be able to make a network of master/slave
> brokers. A master/slave pair acts as a logical broker - so you should
> be able to network them.
>
> BTW what kind of load do you expect? Are the 10K clients mostly
> consumers or are they all publishing etc? e.g. what kinds of
> messages/second are you thinking of.
>
> Depending on your OS and the hardware you're running it on, a single
> broker could deal with 10K clients - its mostly an issue of can the
> broker deal with the IO load, the number of threads & mostly the
> number of sockets that the broker can deal with; but its likely you'll
> want a few less clients per broker - maybe 1-4K per broker.
>
> James
>
> On 3/21/06, Javier Leyba <xleyba@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> >
> > I'm planning to use ActiveMQ in a big environment with more than 10
> > thousands clients subscribed to topics.
> >
> > Obviously, I'll need HA and some kind of load balancing.
> >
> > I've tested a master/slave architecture and it worked (i've problems
> > with my listener now, but it worked).
> >
> > I've tested a net of workers too and it works balancing data.
> >
> > But now I've a big problem. If I use a master/slave option, my server
> > will be receiving a lot of work, specially when clients starts their
> > job at 8am. I really don't know if a broker will work well against
> > such heavy load. The way to avoid this is to have a net of brokers
> > with n brokers receiving the heavy load in a balanced way, but a net
> > of workers give no HA.
> >
> > Now I think my solution could be a mix of both scenarios and I want to
> > ask: Could I make a net of brokers where each broker be a master/slave
> > node ? Is this possible ?
> >
> > Do somebody have another idea to construct my environment ?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > J
> >
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>