Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10855 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2006 18:49:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2006 18:49:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 50854 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2006 18:49:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 50835 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2006 18:49:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 50826 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2006 18:49:56 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:49:56 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [208.176.63.109] (HELO one.chi.ldsys.net) (208.176.63.109) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:49:54 -0800 Received: from [10.10.10.10] (chi.norvax.com [69.210.230.209]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by one.chi.ldsys.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A820C469FA for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:49:32 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <44243F38.70807@ldsys.net> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:49:28 -0600 From: "Christopher G. Stach II" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Every other remote call fails with NoSuchMethodException References: <3556579.post@talk.nabble.com> <3576428.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N James Strachan wrote: > Ah yes - the queue can contain any messages of any type; so make sure > in Lingo-land to use a different queue per message type. > > If it helps, we could get Lingo to add the method name as a JMS header > - then you could use JMS selectors when you bind a queue to a service; > so that the JMS selector would filter out only the right method > invocations > > James > I would have a use for multiple interfaces on the same queue, as well. This is a little off topic, but it reminded me of something. Could you also get Lingo to participate in JTA transacted JMS sessions for one-way asynchronous calls so that the queue only releases the messages when the transaction commits? Please? :) We had to go back to using JmsTemplate because of this limitation. -- Christopher G. Stach II 708-721-5114