Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73395 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2006 20:14:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2006 20:14:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 85551 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2006 20:14:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 85532 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2006 20:14:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 85523 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2006 20:14:09 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:14:09 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 72.21.53.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.21.53.35] (HELO talk.nabble.com) (72.21.53.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:14:07 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=talk.nabble.com) by talk.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1FMsfL-00011r-8i for activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:13:47 -0800 Message-ID: <3578482.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:13:47 -0800 (PST) From: claudem To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Standard JMS client calling lingo server In-Reply-To: <7b3355cb0603241203y693292c3m8d82b4714e8f7db1@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-Sender: claude.montpetit@trilliantnetworks.com X-Nabble-From: claudem References: <3577277.post@talk.nabble.com> <7b3355cb0603241203y693292c3m8d82b4714e8f7db1@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I am new to JMS so I may be missing important points. But isn't Lingo doing something with temporary queues to allow the server to send back result? Isn't there internal data (id) sent between the 2 lingo sides as well? If so, should the non-lingo client replicate this? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Standard-JMS-client-calling-lingo-server-t1338190.html#a3578482 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.