From activemq-users-return-242-apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org Sat Mar 25 01:59:28 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52757 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2006 01:59:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Mar 2006 01:59:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 77587 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2006 01:59:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 77562 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2006 01:59:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 77547 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2006 01:59:28 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:59:28 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of james.strachan@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.189] (HELO nproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.182.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:59:27 -0800 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x29so342212nfb for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:59:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Cf90DGA8pBqXcpJ3Y72jbZQtMTTiCBuoWzEzQrib/9sBI/MQKLk4OrVBIocvDZEZEBqPS4U3xGS8tfMtQBRDEsHvUHyKR7hUqpmMF5PBVLWwfPbZVNs+FcOhsn0tAYOURbsIZXcL9VC2g+CpT0WbIvJyKvrfJIoRtQBwI5YZ+OQ= Received: by 10.48.202.20 with SMTP id z20mr582413nff; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.209.20 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:59:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:59:06 -0800 From: "James Strachan" To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Next release timeframe? In-Reply-To: <3582327.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <3564927.post@talk.nabble.com> <44240041.8010403@medat.de> <3582327.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 3/24/06, john408 wrote: > > I tried using 4.0M4 clients with one of the SNAPSHOTs and it doesn't work= . > So, make sure to upgrade. > > Also, I'm using M4 in a live production environment, and every one in a > while, it will go into spin and hang, using up 100% CPU. We have to resta= rt > everytime to recover. We don't know why it happens and have no idea how t= o > reproduce it. This is causing us serious pain right now. Also, a ping by = any > monitoring software into the JMS port will cause activemq to die. > > James, do you, by any chance, know of these problems? If so, does RC1 hel= p? We've not managed to reproduce any such problems lately; though there have been a number of fixes in RC1 which came up during some soak testing so I'd definitely recommend folks upgrade to RC1 from M4 ASAP -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/