Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25829 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2006 22:09:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2006 22:09:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 9546 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2006 22:09:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-activemq-users-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 9501 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2006 22:09:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact activemq-users-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 9478 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2006 22:09:11 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:09:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of sridharkomandur@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.192 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.192] (HELO uproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.92.192) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:09:10 -0800 Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h2so71652ugf for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:08:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=nR1kai4o6VIT/psUb9NTzkxXkZOC4qgeY5KeBJGSKrzy1U1KVYTnjPJhzyaaxW8C5zAGEHIFbPeCv0jM7d54/OgJIF/D/kv5rHdqM69uVEqzDSEZYhCOrUgVEpAsz3iXfQOh6DTaDs+aQjFUaShN4Xle8Sr35og3Mio+JNU7f8k= Received: by 10.67.30.7 with SMTP id h7mr1700655ugj; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:08:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.22.5 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:08:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:08:49 -0800 From: "Sridhar Komandur" Sender: sridharkomandur@gmail.com To: user@activemq.codehaus.org Subject: Re: [activemq-user] Network of Brokers ... Cc: "ActiveMQ User" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3415_26621135.1140732529513" References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_3415_26621135.1140732529513 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Rob, thanks for your email. Would you mind clarifying item 1 below, what if there are more than one pat= h between producer and a consumer for the given networkTTL ? Will the consumer_broker receive as many messages as the number of paths ? (I hope not). Could you please elaborate on the details of message routing in this case ? Thanks! Regards - Sridhar On 2/19/06, Rob Davies wrote: > > > Networks are being updated currently for release 4.0 > Consumers are propagated around the network - but within constraints: > > 1. networkTTL - number of hops (brokers) that this information will > pass through - networkTTL also applies to messages dispatched as well > 2. exclusiveDestinations - can exclude destinations from network > traffic (can use wild-cards etc) > 3. inclusiveDestinations - can specify only destinations which are in > the inclusive list to be propagated around the network > > > I'll update the wiki with this information once we're satisfied its > working. > > cheers, > > Rob > > On 13 Feb 2006, at 23:15, Sridhar Komandur wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > 1. Can anyone clarify how the routing info is shared within Network of > > Brokers > > - is the producer/subscription info known to all the brokers > > in the > > network ? As I understand, > > 4.0 follows demand-forwarding for the actual message flow. > > > > 2. Has anyone /deployed/thought of/ an architecture where multiple > > "Network > > of Brokers" clusters would be deployed ? > > (not unlike ISP domains, within the same enterprise - for > > capacity or > > ownership reasons). > > I was wondering how "routes" can be selectively disseminated > > between > > the clusters. > > > > > > Thanks for any insights into the above. > > > > Thanks > > Regards > > - Sridhar Komandur > > ------=_Part_3415_26621135.1140732529513--