activemq-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "DeSantis, MJ Mark @ IS (7179)" <>
Subject RE: Question about connection pooling
Date Fri, 06 Jan 2006 17:02:32 GMT
I really don't know the amount of network saturation, but I suppose there
could be some underlying issues with the network and microsoft server 2003.
I'll check with our tech guy and search a little online for any issues
involving activemq and ms server 2003.

As far as the version I've tried both 3.0 and 3.2.1 - both have similar

Thanks for the reply. Any other insights would be appreciated.


-----Original Message-----
From: Hiram Chirino [] 
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: Question about connection pooling

20 seconds sounds like a long time for me too.  For me, new  
connections are established in under a second.

Is there much load on the sever/network?  What version of ActiveMQ  
are you using?


On Jan 5, 2006, at 4:47 PM, DeSantis, MJ Mark @ IS (7179) wrote:

> Hello all,
> I'm pretty new to ActiveMq so forgive my naiveté.
> I have a project I'm working on which, though Jms, spawns new JVMs
> on remote
> machines. Threads in those new JVMs then register with the Jms  
> server to
> listen for jms messages themselves. The problem I'm facing is that  
> it seems
> there is about a 20 second delay for those threads to connect to  
> the server
> - that is too slow. I was wondering if there was some sort of  
> connection
> pooling that activemq can be configured to implement. I though  
> perhaps if
> activemq could have a pool of open connections perhaps my threads  
> could
> connect to jms faster.
> Thanks
> Mark

View raw message