activemq-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lionel Cons (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (ARTEMIS-1907) Confusion between AIO and ASYNCIO
Date Mon, 04 Jun 2018 13:03:00 GMT
Lionel Cons created ARTEMIS-1907:
------------------------------------

             Summary: Confusion between AIO and ASYNCIO
                 Key: ARTEMIS-1907
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1907
             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Lionel Cons


It seems that, in the user manual at least, there is a confusion between {{AIO}} and {{ASYNCIO}}.

For instance, https://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/persistence.html contains:
{quote}
The second implementation uses a thin native code wrapper to talk to the Linux asynchronous
IO library (AIO). With AIO, Apache ActiveMQ Artemis will [...]
{quote}
and further down:
{quote}
journal-type: Valid values are NIO, ASYNCIO or MAPPED
{quote}

In https://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/using-server.html we even have:
{quote}
--aio Sets the journal as asyncio.
{quote}

Looking at numbers, it seems that {{AIO}} is used more than {{ASYNCIO}}:
{code}
$ grep -wri aio docs/user-manual | wc -l
29
$ grep -wri asyncio docs/user-manual | wc -l
5
{code}

Using only one term everywhere would be more consistent and clearer for the reader.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message