activemq-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lionel Cons (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ARTEMIS-1906) anycastPrefix and multicastPrefix should be kept in mapped addresses
Date Tue, 05 Jun 2018 05:18:00 GMT


Lionel Cons commented on ARTEMIS-1906:

[~jbertram] thanks for pointing me to these settings.

I did check
before creating this Jira issue. It would make sense to list them in this configuration reference

> anycastPrefix and multicastPrefix should be kept in mapped addresses
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-1906
>                 URL:
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Lionel Cons
>            Priority: Major
> For STOMP (at least), {{anycastPrefix}} and {{multicastPrefix}} are used to map destinations
to addresses and routing types.
> In order to have compatibility with other brokers such as ActiveMQ 5 or RabbitMQ, these
prefixes must be set to {{anycastPrefix=/queue/}} and {{multicastPrefix=/topic/}}. With these
settings, a destination like {{/queue/foo}} works like a JMS queue while {{/topic/foo}} works
like a JMS topic. So far, so good.
> Unfortunately, the current implementation removes these prefixes when mapping to addresses.
This means that the two (completely unrelated, see ARTEMIS-1794) destinations {{/queue/foo}}
and {{/topic/foo}} map to the exact same address named {{foo}}. Messaging does work as expected
because the same address can have multiple routing types but monitoring and security become
> Security is defined per address so the two destinations {{/queue/foo}} and {{/topic/foo}}
cannot have different security settings.
> Similarly, some monitoring information is attached to the address objects so {{/queue/foo}}
and {{/topic/foo}} cannot have different monitoring metrics.
> It seems all these problems would disappear if prefixes would be kept when mapping STOMP
destinations to addresses.
> Note: similar problems might exist with other protocols but I've tested it only using

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message