activemq-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ARTEMIS-1499) ArtemisExecutor and ProcessorBase needs support of recursive blocking executions
Date Fri, 03 Nov 2017 21:13:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16238389#comment-16238389
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-1499:
-----------------------------------------

Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1638
  
    @franz1981 yeah.. I think we should close this... because:
    
    It's not actually even loop. A ProcessorBase is just the context of a fake executor. Each
OrderedExecutor will have its own instance.. This thing may confuse things a bit.
    
    Say you have 10 running sessions doing deliveries. .you will end up with 10 threads..
each an instance of the OrderedExecutor.. the only difference is that this will take a thread
from the pool and it may schedule tasks on that.


> ArtemisExecutor and ProcessorBase needs support of recursive blocking executions
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-1499
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1499
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Francesco Nigro
>            Assignee: Francesco Nigro
>            Priority: Major
>
> The (ProcessorBase and) ArtemisExecutor allows recursive executions of blocking tasks
(FutureLatch) that block the background event loop: it would be optimal to support recursive
executions to handle them.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Mime
View raw message