Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8B7200C67 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 10:28:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 33D72160BCE; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 777AE160BC1 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 10:28:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 81285 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2017 08:28:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 81275 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2017 08:28:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:28:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0C38DC0362 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:28:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZDfgXbHUHuCt for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id EEC9D5FCB9 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7A9D5E0D4D for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2A77A242F9 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 08:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 08:28:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" To: issues@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ARTEMIS-1162) Make new Adapting TimedBuffer and old Fixed TimedBuffer configurable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Mon, 15 May 2017 08:28:08 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16010156#comment-16010156 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-1162: ----------------------------------------- Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1268 @franz1981 and here in lies the issue, that the project doesn't currently have a set of agreed performance metrics for different end 2 end scenarios, that are run automatically and reported each release. I like micro benchmarks as they help isolate a problem, and quickly test if the changes look promising and the best we have today. As we move to look at other perf improvements without the end 2 end scenarios reporting perf metrics version to version, some changes may start to even step on each other, e.g. one fix may actually regress another, e.g. the classical, batching can improve throughput very easily but trades it for latency. > Make new Adapting TimedBuffer and old Fixed TimedBuffer configurable > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ARTEMIS-1162 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-1162 > Project: ActiveMQ Artemis > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 2.1.0 > Reporter: Michael Andre Pearce > Fix For: 2.2.0 > > > New Adapting TimedBuffer was added and replaced existing Fixed TimedBuffer. This could cause behaviour/performance change of journal IO (and hopefully for the better). > As this hasn't been run significantly in a real world production environment, to avoid causing any production deployment issues having unexpected behaviour changes, or to allow managed rollout and rollback. > We would like to add back the fixed timed buffer (default), and make it configurable to the new improved timed buffer. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)