activemq-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Justin Bertram (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ARTEMIS-994) Support Netty Native Epoll on Linux
Date Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:05:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15883104#comment-15883104
] 

Justin Bertram commented on ARTEMIS-994:
----------------------------------------

{quote}
...use benchmarks to measure the gain.
{quote}
This is essentially what I'm asking about, although you're talking about retro-active benchmarking.
 I'm asking about pro-active benchmarking - the kind of benchmarking that would allow one
to identify a performance bottleneck for a particular use-case.  In any case, were going to
want to perform benchmarking to understand what kind of gains this change will make and what
use-cases it will benefit the most.  I'm not naive enough to believe it will be the best option
for any and all use-cases.  If we can acquire data on this front "for free" from someone who's
already done it (e.g. [~michael.andre.pearce]) then so much the better.  Do you think this
is a waste of time, [~clebertsuconic]?


> Support Netty Native Epoll on Linux
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-994
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-994
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.5.3
>            Reporter: Michael Andre Pearce (IG)
>
> Netty has support for native epoll, this is available only on linux systems. This is
more performant.
> http://netty.io/wiki/native-transports.html
> This is inline with supporting asyncio with libaio using such native feature to bring
perfomance benefits to artemis.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Mime
View raw message