Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88221200C0F for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:49:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 86C4E160B34; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D60D6160B3A for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:49:31 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 70384 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2017 14:49:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 70375 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2017 14:49:30 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:49:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 773A91A04F5 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:49:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RaFY3qKs06YX for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id B341E5F47A for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 82204E104D for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6A8E225284 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:49:26 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andreas Gies (JIRA)" To: issues@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (AMQ-6568) Consumers stop consuming MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:49:32 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15828205#comment-15828205 ] Andreas Gies commented on AMQ-6568: ----------------------------------- Hi Gary, thanks - everything is fine as usual. Guess whatt app we are doing ;) - I see you are still in AMQ land .... I will pass on the request for a heap dump as this to be taken from production and update the ticket a.s.a.p. I will dig into the memory limits - any suggestions what I should be tracing ? - Should I see something in the logs if the limits are insufficient ? Thanks for the quick answer - I know I am doing something stupid here Andreas > Consumers stop consuming > ------------------------- > > Key: AMQ-6568 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6568 > Project: ActiveMQ > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Broker, JMS client > Affects Versions: 5.14.2 > Environment: CentOS 6.5, Java 7, 64-bit > Reporter: Andreas Gies > Attachments: broker.xml, ThreadDump.txt, UnDamaged_ThreadDump.txt.zip > > > We are working on a fairly large distributed project using ActiveMQ as our JMS backend. > Currently we are using Version 5.14.2. > The application consists of many containers communicating over AMQ. > All JMS communication endpoints are implemented with Camel 2.17.3. > The container itself is an OSGi container on top of Apache Felix, all implemented in Scala. > The production version is based on Scala 2.10 / JDK 7. The next version will be Scala 2.11 / JDK 8. > We are not using Karaf, but have our own bundles to implement container configuration > and distribution. > The overall install base is roughly 2500 containers in as many local site connected to the > central data center. The data center does not run AMQ, but a different JMS provider. All local > containers use AMQ und bridge into the data center. > Our problem is that we observe in ~1% of our containers that messages are not being delivered > from AMQ. The Queue Size is > 0 and the consuming Camel Route is started, but no message > is dispatched. Message producers can still produce messages, but none are dispatched. > In such a scenario no messages are dispatched to any consumers. Restating the route bundles > does not have an effect, only restarting the containers rectifies the problem. > Our investigation so far has not given any hints what might be special regarding the circumstances > when we encounter the problem. We have taken thread dumps from containers in that state, but > have not been able to spot the problem. > The initial question is whether someone in the community could provide us a hint how we could > narrow down the problem. > For today I am attaching our AMQ configuration file and also one of latest thread dumps. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)