activemq-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Quinn Stevenson (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ARTEMIS-737) Add JUnit Rules
Date Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:07:20 GMT


Quinn Stevenson commented on ARTEMIS-737:

I don't necessarily think this approach is "better" than the existing test suite.  I was looking
for something simple for end-user testing - similar to what I contributed to ActiveMQ (activemq-junit)
a while back.

I don't have any expectations on whether or not these rules would help with testing Artemis
itself - I'm not familiar enough with Artemis yet to have an informed opinion on that.  So
I wouldn't expect internal Artemis tests to use these Rules -but they could if it made sense.

And No - I didn't have any plans on converting the existing test cases.  Again, if the Rule
looks like it would make sense for those tests, I'd be happy to try and convert some of them.
 But these Rules were primarily targeted and end-users (like me) who want to easily test their
applications (like my Camel routes).

> Add JUnit Rules
> ---------------
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-737
>                 URL:
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Broker
>            Reporter: Quinn Stevenson
>            Priority: Minor
> ActiveMQ includes a JUnit rule for embedding a JMS Broker.  This would be a nice feature
to have for Artemis as well, along with the JUnit rules for JMS Clients.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message