From dev-return-70563-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@activemq.apache.org Thu May 9 09:44:21 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BACC180649 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 11:44:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 87018 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2019 09:44:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 87006 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2019 09:44:18 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 May 2019 09:44:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id F2B7E180C92 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 09:44:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.201 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7aE6qZfL5qKr for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 09:44:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi1-f174.google.com (mail-oi1-f174.google.com [209.85.167.174]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 32E835F2FF for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 09:44:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f174.google.com with SMTP id k9so1401766oig.9 for ; Thu, 09 May 2019 02:44:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=J1hfmmKL9IV20ZpHPkoMNCMCrUWLPv+ahu5DSzj5RAw=; b=SxfqPYAJn8jP1vjvdsSGwjeP7qP5BPwv/qCiFzOfWwpq63m1f02BTXL0liYoqL7vyu 8IzLcQSQbPDTbY39dYhe28PgyUkqf4pGUNNSt/rJrXym/4XygvwKAy4UD6j7UXJdQON8 74cCQDl0gwe4MP1w8X3jH3p7Xu7XLtrTli5M96H8dGRCdLWJxl9CmRTIWvuCJVfAKNM1 4ApxQMvPOOzbZ0ZArIr4/kV6eQX9QXIpt4kCAtZqUaWI2iOyySLlxwROFMQ7sOwMI0K0 m1l84RxvgGrsjCNpmAIAQCtNOvfIAfW44rUuZuRgJgSgl1nwFSC2Ig75N/Hye36qF5sL yLKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=J1hfmmKL9IV20ZpHPkoMNCMCrUWLPv+ahu5DSzj5RAw=; b=divUEz1I5zY8b/ZIN2j/slQFr5VC8HwG1FD9W3LFaQrzrz/ukNLJTTooWJ6QRd4DHB lvEgqwre+08BnyWXno7ITp3uTNJjJ0dLN7ZKtfIkofxs9lit4WDNXeHpKyV2e0gwiG0O FPU0ctF4pGP/UCKX8D0OgkGtsjRVIrbPL63pu9MG3kTJoe/J6JXkOAWD/SUL/BB8csn5 MBe1RvbiJ23v8Jt42A5VtkGGaDw3rFum3wrcKla1eaG+moTK5xK0h01gdnbJIXCplynP nubzvqB69QqMcNPAzG566XoKy5O4FGYskaXeuWS1D7gxglMxmAtdp3TANjn57I2VUp9o 8QhQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUDs1WF942zRKziV6j4fS2sFnAclYopxwm1ou1TphB5NqROou3Y tB/VlZKvpcKxyMojK4MHZMvG2kNcnbv4oyW3xM+Amg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwfEVE8zTaUqFMtSGK0YS2P9EPXMZlXgwxEQyGkhnyd9rPB2vc1aiib5pgNevT2UUuESjJPCWdTCn3cNJjysVY= X-Received: by 2002:aca:3946:: with SMTP id g67mr987255oia.28.1557395054582; Thu, 09 May 2019 02:44:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Robbie Gemmell Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 10:44:05 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Artemis Documentation for older releases on WebSite To: dev@activemq.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I think trimming older release doc content to keep the site managable is reasonable, and there are various approaches that could be used to trim things. Over at Qpid we tend to trim down to the last 2 years or so of release docs every now and then (its overdue currently, carrying just over 3). If taking an approach like that, as example there would clearly be old Artemis docs that could be removed. Another approach might be, removing even more docs for version streams not considered the current for some time, e.g maybe now all the 1.x Artemis docs could go except the latest 1.5.6 release. Looking at the size and content of the release docs themselves is perhaps also important. Having a peek at whats there currently for the refreshed ActiveMQ site, I see the 5.x javadocs are using about 400MB per release, but over half of it looks to be for source html. If so, I think thats of limited value personally, with IDEs often pulling source(+javadoc) jars directly and browsers having various web UI options such as GitHub etc to utilise. Thats >200MB per release I think we could perhaps remove and substitute with a link to the release tag. Robbie On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 22:25, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > Do we still need to provide documentation for older releases? > A big portion of the size now on the website is due to older releases. > > > I believe we should stop doing that, after all if you go to the > archive on previous releases, the binary will include documentations.