activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release
Date Wed, 15 May 2019 05:39:30 GMT
Hi Christopher,

Agree for the Jira, my bad, I'm creating the Jira today for the tracking.

For 5.16.x, it sounds like a plan.

I will release 5.15.10 and then, I will move forward on 5.16.0
preparation with JDK 11 support (build and runtime).

Thanks !
Regards
JB

On 14/05/2019 16:17, Christopher Shannon wrote:
> Yes they were minor but we currently use Jira for the release notes so it's
> good to have visibility to users know what changed.
> 
> Master is already on 5.16.0-SNAPSHOT.  It's fine to do a 5.15.10 my point
> is just that it's pretty clear we need to get 5.16.0 out the door if we are
> already hitting 10 point releases for 5.15 so I would like to get that JDK
> 11 support figured out.  If there's issues with building with JDK 11 then
> we could always wait for build compatibility for the next release but at
> least make sure it's runtime compatible with JDK 11.
> 
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 8:27 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> The PRs without Jira were minor, but I will create the corresponding
>> Jira anyway, at least for the tracking.
>>
>> For the release, I propose the following:
>>
>> 1. Release 5.15.10 with the merge
>> 2. Once 5.15.10 is released, I will create 5.16.x branch focus on JDK 11
>> support.
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 14/05/2019 12:45, Christopher Shannon wrote:
>>> Also, one more thing, you merged a bunch of PRs today but none of them
>> have
>>> Jiras.  We need to have Jiras for all of those so that we can track the
>>> commits in the release notes.
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 6:34 AM Christopher Shannon <
>>> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ooops, I read the proposal as 5.15.0 not 5.15.10 :)
>>>>
>>>> So I think my opinion probably stands either way.  We could do a 5.15.10
>>>> but we really need to get 5.16.0 out the door and stop doing patch
>> releases
>>>> on 5.15.x.  The only thing holding back 5.16.0 is the JDK 11 support but
>>>> there's some nice improvements to 5.16.0 that I would like to see
>> released
>>>> (such as some KahaDB improvements)
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 6:32 AM Christopher Shannon <
>>>> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I assume you mean 5.16.0
>>>>>
>>>>> I've probably mentioned this a few times in various posts and chat but
>> my
>>>>> opinion is we need to support JDK 11 so I consider this issue a blocker
>>>>> until resolved. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7087
>>>>>
>>>>> 5.16.0 should still be compatible to run on JDK 8 or JDK 11 but (since
>>>>> JDK 11 is the new LTS build) we should be able to run a build and pass
>> all
>>>>> tests using both 8 and 11 as well.  I have done work here to get it to
>>>>> build with JDK 11 but all of the OSGi tests and stuff are broken and
>> I'm
>>>>> not sure how to fix it as I haven't worked very much with OSGi.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the commit I started work on 6 months ago:
>>>>>
>> https://github.com/cshannon/activemq/commit/68c91621a0568a0d47e66a800833e1770c27b7d8
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 1:53 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi team,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I started to review some PRs and I'm also working on some
>>>>>> improvements/fixes PR (for OSGi, but also preparing better cloud
>> support
>>>>>> features).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to submit to vote ActiveMQ 5.15.10 over the week end
or
>>>>>> beginning of next week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No objection ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Mime
View raw message