activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Shannon <christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0
Date Wed, 14 Mar 2018 23:54:25 GMT
Agree with Justin, I wouldn't stop this release unless it is a
regression caused since 2.4.0.  We can always do bug fix releases even
if they only contain a couple of fixes if they are of high importance.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:09 PM, Justin Bertram <jbertram@apache.org> wrote:
> So is this a regression or a new issue?  If it's a regression then I think
> it should be fixed.  If it's a new issue then I think it should go in 2.5.1
> in short order.
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Michael André Pearce <
> michael.andre.pearce@me.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> So I have managed to create an integration test that re-creates the
>> problem.
>> https://github.com/michaelandrepearce/activemq-artemis/tree/
>> NetworkHealthCheckIssue
>>
>> Essentially when NetworkHealthCheck detects network failure issue, the
>> server is stopped, once the network issue is resolved, it obviously detects
>> this and restart the server again.
>>
>> If prior to the network issue, a change validly is made (as we support
>> reloading these sections) to broker.xml is made for address-settings,
>> security-settings, address’s or queue’s these are lost when the server is
>> restarted, when the above occurs.
>>
>> During the initialization stage it seems the broker is resetting it
>> configured state back to the config that was very first loaded, not the
>> config that was last/most recently reloaded.
>>
>> This in my view is a blocker as essentially broker is losing changed
>> configured state and can cause obvious issues, when intermittent network
>> issues occur, which in any system is likely at some point, either in
>> disaster or network maintenance.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Mike
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On 14 Mar 2018, at 21:02, Michael André Pearce <
>> michael.andre.pearce@me.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > We’ve spotted a nasty issue, I’m trying to put an integration test
>> together to have recreatable the problem, but taking me some time.
>> >
>> > Can you give me another 24hours? To create the test to share then for
>> you to decide if the issue is blocking or not.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPhone
>> >
>> >> On 14 Mar 2018, at 09:50, Francesco Nigro <nigro.fra@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> Compiled and run some tests on it
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Il giorno mer 14 mar 2018 alle ore 10:46 Dejan Bosanac <
>> dejan@nighttale.net>
>> >> ha scritto:
>> >>
>> >>> +1
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards
>> >>> --
>> >>> Dejan Bosanac
>> >>> http://sensatic.net/about
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Christopher Shannon <
>> >>> christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> +1
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Timothy Bish <tabish121@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>> On 03/12/2018 04:40 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.5.0
release.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> This is a great release, with 190 tasks completed including
bug
>> fixes,
>> >>>>>> improvements, new features and additional tasks. I really
appreciate
>> >>>>>> everyone's contribution on making this happening. Thank
you so much!
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I would like to highlight the features introduced on this
release:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-853] - Support for exclusive consumers
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1030] - Support equivilent ActiveMQ 5.x Virtual
Topic
>> Naming
>> >>>>>> Abilities
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1548] - Support CRL
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1550] - Support LVQ for OpenWire
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1600] - Support masked passwords in bootstrap.xm
and
>> >>>> login.config
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1623] - create an ActiveMQServerPlugin for logging
various
>> >>>>>> broker events
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1649] - enable openssl provider for Netty
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1661] - Enable splitting of broker.xml into multiple
files
>> >>>>>> [ARTEMIS-1663] - Add enhanced message count and size metrics
for
>> >>> Queues
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Given the length of this release, please refer to JIRA for
the
>> >>>>>> complete report of fixes included on 2.5.0:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>> >>>> projectId=12315920&version=12342127
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.5.0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The Maven repository is here:
>> >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> >>>> orgapacheactivemq-1156
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on
examples:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-
>> >>>> guide/validating-releases.html
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The source tag:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.
>> >>>> git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.5.0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0
>> >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> >>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Here's my +1
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> +1
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> * Validated license and notice files
>> >>>>> * Validated signatures and checksums
>> >>>>> * Ran the binary broker and ran some AMQP sample applications
against
>> >>> it
>> >>>>> * Built from source and ran some of the tests
>> >>>>> * Ran mvn -P release apache-rat:check to validate source files
had
>> >>>> license
>> >>>>> headers
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Tim Bish
>> >>>>> twitter: @tabish121
>> >>>>> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>>

Mime
View raw message