From dev-return-63817-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@activemq.apache.org Wed Jan 31 13:22:08 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D844C180662 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:22:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id C7FD5160C35; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 15440160C25 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:22:07 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 37994 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2018 12:22:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 37982 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2018 12:22:06 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:22:06 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 613E2DFBC6; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:22:06 +0000 (UTC) From: cshannon To: dev@activemq.apache.org Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #1827: Improve paged message acknowledge Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20180131122206.613E2DFBC6@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:22:06 +0000 (UTC) Github user cshannon commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1827#discussion_r165035847 --- Diff: artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/impl/RefsOperation.java --- @@ -152,14 +153,14 @@ protected void rollbackRedelivery(Transaction tx, MessageReference ref, long tim @Override public void afterCommit(final Transaction tx) { for (MessageReference ref : refsToAck) { - synchronized (ref.getQueue()) { - queue.postAcknowledge(ref); - } + queue.postAcknowledge(ref); } if (pagedMessagesToPostACK != null) { for (MessageReference refmsg : pagedMessagesToPostACK) { - decrementRefCount(refmsg); --- End diff -- I agree that right now it doesn't seem to be of much use except for large messages. However if this gets taken out I would be a little concerned about introducing a future bug if other message types end up relying on this in the future. ---