From dev-return-63256-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@activemq.apache.org Thu Jan 11 13:32:32 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF480180656 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 13:32:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id DEFC9160C20; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 599E9160C1F for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 13:32:31 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 94013 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2018 12:32:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 94002 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2018 12:32:30 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:32:30 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 0BC33E9622; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:32:30 +0000 (UTC) From: mtaylor To: dev@activemq.apache.org Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #1759: [ARTEMIS-1241] check for FQQN and autoc... Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20180111123230.0BC33E9622@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Github user mtaylor commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1759#discussion_r160926081 --- Diff: artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/impl/ActiveMQServerImpl.java --- @@ -2834,7 +2842,7 @@ public Queue createQueue(final SimpleString address, throw ActiveMQMessageBundle.BUNDLE.invalidRoutingTypeForAddress(routingType, info.getName().toString(), info.getRoutingTypes()); } - final QueueConfig queueConfig = queueConfigBuilder.filter(filter).pagingManager(pagingManager).user(user).durable(durable).temporary(temporary).autoCreated(autoCreated).routingType(routingType).maxConsumers(maxConsumers).purgeOnNoConsumers(purgeOnNoConsumers).build(); + final QueueConfig queueConfig = queueConfigBuilder.filter(filter).pagingManager(pagingManager).user(user).durable(durable).temporary(temporary).autoCreated(autoCreated).routingType(routingTypeToUse).maxConsumers(maxConsumers).purgeOnNoConsumers(purgeOnNoConsumers).build(); --- End diff -- The routing type should be decided by the protocol handler and passed in. ---