Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5C0200D54 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 18:52:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 6ABC6160C0D; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B1389160BFD for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 18:52:48 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 28639 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2017 17:52:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 28627 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2017 17:52:47 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:52:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id EA050C5433 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:52:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.15 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.15 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.053, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=me.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZbtoT5F63Qxa for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:52:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pv33p33im-asmtp002.me.com (pv33p33im-asmtp002.me.com [17.142.241.11]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 32FD85FAD6 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:52:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from process-dkim-sign-daemon.pv33p33im-asmtp002.me.com by pv33p33im-asmtp002.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.1.2.20170607 64bit (built Jun 7 2017)) id <0P0N00L00LF9OZ00@pv33p33im-asmtp002.me.com> for dev@activemq.apache.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:52:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=04042017; t=1512755558; bh=uvB6QPEF3uixw3/DXu/0S9F6mb1HqM5lBa9ZL1M/bSc=; h=From:Content-type:MIME-version:Date:Subject:Message-id:To; b=017TTbtXQgBh03+jcsDTSPkI9NPsAnN+G04md4OLhA5Bcduwb4DjfpI5vUCH22xw5 liI9LY3P1xkKUYVKY/pNU0W3hK0nL1RM0XUilZaXDU9lH6Tt/I5ODlIkqhzSMcMHym twRyNxAWNwD4zB3nbT/xpHpfXtpUgqOyWbo/wABPrZyWd53ShIfVsGoN1XWRqPydX9 tvhnqszX/yB9uV/R8vA/nZe++6bEPb6REhWl0ccjgDGdXY+VPklRnLVDHUpHL1DciU G6De70jPDJMAB7OFlS8GreTzIs7AQMNXh97RJnb4ZvtWTR4buNLNpJG09QNoAV06ac Rl5ELUCd9Brkg== Received: from icloud.com ([127.0.0.1]) by pv33p33im-asmtp002.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.1.2.20170607 64bit (built Jun 7 2017)) with ESMTPSA id <0P0N00IS9LNMMD20@pv33p33im-asmtp002.me.com> for dev@activemq.apache.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:52:37 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-12-08_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1712080244 From: =?utf-8?Q?Michael_Andr=C3=A9_Pearce?= Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable MIME-version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:52:34 +0000 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Move PR discussions to another list... Message-id: <07177352-1898-4670-8BD3-2B9CFA995491@me.com> References: <1512598852977-0.post@n4.nabble.com> <5d3a9ae8-65f8-326f-74d9-aef3d37eedc7@gmail.com> <1512667505738-0.post@n4.nabble.com> In-reply-to: <1512667505738-0.post@n4.nabble.com> To: dev@activemq.apache.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15C114) archived-at: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:52:49 -0000 Just to clear on my comment much earlier on, it=E2=80=99s my feeling about i= t only. I=E2=80=99m not strongly opinionated thus I didn=E2=80=99t -1 or +1 i= t, maybe I should have +0 it, I personally wouldn=E2=80=99t change it, but i= f the group wants to I won=E2=80=99t be upset either. it=E2=80=99s email after all I=E2=80=99m sure and i can always subscribe to a= n extra list. Sent from my iPhone > On 7 Dec 2017, at 17:25, artnaseef wrote: >=20 > For all the folks arguing that change is not needed - let me ask a questio= n. >=20 > Is the concern clear? >=20 > I thought Clebert's post showing the mailing list did a good job, but we c= an > talk more about the concern. >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.htm= l