activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Johan Edstrom <seij...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ Artemis becomes ActiveMQ 6
Date Wed, 06 Dec 2017 15:27:27 GMT
-1 Non binding for the same reasons.

> On Dec 6, 2017, at 8:20 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> -1
> 
> agree with Rob
> 
> Hadrian
> 
> 
> On 12/05/2017 05:17 AM, Rob Davies wrote:
>> [0] - without a clear migration path and tooling to assist existing users moving
from ActiveMQ 5 to Artemis, we risk abandoning those  users - who may then be forced to look
at alternatives and abandon ActiveMQ all together. This could be counter productive to the
original intent.
>>> On 4 Dec 2017, at 20:32, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Following on from the discussion, "[DISCUSS] Confusion surrounding the
>>> ActiveMQ project roadmap"
>>> 
>>> linked here for convenience :
>>> - http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Confusion-surrounding-the-ActiveMQ-project-roadmap-td4732935.html
>>> - http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Re-DISCUSS-Confusion-surrounding-the-ActiveMQ-project-roadmap-td4733148.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I would like to propose a vote on ActiveMQ Artemis mainline becoming ActiveMQ
6.
>>> 
>>> [+1] -  agree
>>> [-1] . - disagree and provide some reason
>>> [0] - neutral but go ahead
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open until Thursday, Dec 07 by the end of the day.
>>> 
>>> Here is my +1 (PMC) vote.


Mime
View raw message