activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [HEADS UP] Artemis release this week
Date Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:17:43 GMT
I'm still dealing with some auto-create defaults.. I could figure out
everything I need but I'm still cleaning up my code before I can put a
PR. and one last case I need to investigate. Can we delay till monday
(or.. I hope not Tuesday.. but possibly)

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am having an issue with auto created destinations. I am trying to get it
> done by tomorrow.  If not will ask a delay.
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 2:58 AM Michael André Pearce
> <michael.andre.pearce@me.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Justin,
>>
>> I’ve just put an issue in hawtio asking if they can tag in the next day or
>> two, as I’d like to bump hawtio version before we tag if possible.
>>
>>  essentially there are some bug fixes (escaped mbean url) that are fixed
>> already in their master but they simply haven’t tagged. I would hope we know
>> in next day if they’re able to do this.
>>
>> But if we could hold off just for a day or so please, so we have the
>> chance.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Mike
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On 23 Oct 2017, at 16:30, Martes Wigglesworth <mwiggles@redhat.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Definitely.
>> >
>> > I am re-posting now.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Andy Taylor <andy.tayls67@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> This probably warrants a separate thread
>> >>
>> >> On 23 October 2017 at 16:11, Martes Wigglesworth <mwiggles@redhat.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Greetings Justin.
>> >>>
>> >>> Do you have any time to chat about the artemis implementation of
>> >>> ActiveMQConnectionFactory, and why the setters and getters were
>> >>> removed?
>> >>>
>> >>> We are working on integration of AMQ with bigdata tools and they are
>> >>> expecting AMQ-Artemis to behave as old AMQConnectionFactory used to.
>> >>>
>> >>> By this I am referencing the omission of an exposed interface for
>> >>> setting
>> >>> and getting brokerURL.
>> >>>
>> >>> Any insight on this topic would be appreciated, since I looked at a
>> >>> patch
>> >>> and it required either a legacy named wrapper of
>> >> ActiveMQConnectionFactory,
>> >>> or ActiveMQJMSConnectionFactory, to re-insert the setBrokerURL and
>> >>> getBrokerURL.
>> >>>
>> >>> I figured this would get a huge "heck-no" from the team if I attempted
>> >>> to
>> >>> create an issue, and submit a pull request, so I wanted to verify the
>> >>> situation before moving forward.  (This is due to NiagraFiles
>> >>> requiring
>> >>> access to the brokerURL property, because of the assumed accessor
>> >>> methods
>> >>> which existed in AMQ prior to artemis.)
>> >>>
>> >>> Is there an internal AMQ dev list that I can get on, at RH?
>> >>>
>> >>> I apologize if this inquiry is out-of-scope for this list.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Justin Bertram <jbertram@apache.org>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I'm planning an Artemis release (2.4.0) later this week so anybody
>> >>>> who
>> >>>> wants a fix should send a PR if they haven't already.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Justin
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Martes G Wigglesworth
>> >>> Senior Middleware Consultant
>> >>> Red Hat Consulting
>> >>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> >>> Office Phone: 804 343 6084 <callto:804%20343%206084> - 8136084
>> >>> Office Email: mwiggles@redhat.com
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Martes G Wigglesworth
>> > Senior Middleware Consultant
>> > Red Hat Consulting
>> > Red Hat, Inc.
>> > Office Phone: 804 343 6084 <callto:804%20343%206084> - 8136084
>> > Office Email: mwiggles@redhat.com
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Mime
View raw message