activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.3.0
Date Fri, 01 Sep 2017 00:24:41 GMT
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:15 PM Timothy Bish <tabish121@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 08/31/2017 07:59 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> > 1. worked for me... nothing changed really...
>
> I had a space in the path that the extractor was nice enough to add,
> although it seems like it should be smart enough to handle that case as
> spaces are valid if a little dumb



I test it all the time with spaces. I have an internal CI doing it with an
example.



.
>
> >
> > 2. I think this is a bug with one specific browser (Safari).
>
> I was using FireFox so guess not just one browser.


What version of Firefox ?

>
>
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Timothy Bish <tabish121@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> On 08/31/2017 03:38 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> >>> I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.3.0 release.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> We had these new features added as part of 2.3.0:
> >>>
> >>> [ARTEMIS-1270] - Provide a Management Console for Artemis
> >>> [ARTEMIS-1322] - Add a ServerLocator option to ignore topology for
> >>> load-balancing
> >>> [ARTEMIS-1324] - Critical Analysis and deadlock detection on broker
> >>> [ARTEMIS-1342] - Support Netty Native KQueue on MacOS
> >>> [ARTEMIS-1348] - Support LVQ for AMQP
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The release notes can be found here:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920&version=12341247
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Source and binary distributions can be found here:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1145/org/apache/activemq/apache-artemis/2.3.0/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The Maven repository is here:
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1145
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
> >>>
> >>>
> http://activemq.apache.org/artemis/docs/latest/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The source tag:
> >>>
> >>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.3.0
> >>>
> >>> I will update the website after the vote has passed.
> >>>
> >>> * The vote will remain open until Sep-5th 2017 at 3:30 PM EST
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.2.0
> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>
> >>> Here's my (binding) +1
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> * = (which is over the usual 72 hours, which I decided to give US
> >>> people some extra time to review this release as there is a holiday
> >>> for this coming weekend)
> >>>
> >> Two things I've noticed so far in checking the release:
> >>
> >> 1. After creating a broker instance from the binary tar.gz and running
> that
> >> instance I get the following in the console
> >>
> >> Could not load Logmanager "org.jboss.logmanager.LogManager"
> >> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.jboss.logmanager.LogManager
> >>      at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
> >>      at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
> >>      at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
> >>      at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:357)
> >>      at java.util.logging.LogManager$1.run(LogManager.java:195)
> >>      at java.util.logging.LogManager$1.run(LogManager.java:181)
> >>      at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> >>      at java.util.logging.LogManager.<clinit>(LogManager.java:181)
> >>      at java.util.logging.Logger.demandLogger(Logger.java:448)
> >>      at java.util.logging.Logger.getLogger(Logger.java:502)
> >>      at
> org.apache.activemq.artemis.boot.Artemis.<clinit>(Artemis.java:40)
> >>
> >> 2. When I visit the Web console at http://localhost:8161/console I get
> a
> >> console but not with ActiveMQ branding on it, it has mostly Hawt.io
> branding
> >> which I'm guessing is wrong ;)  This seems -1 worthy unless I've done
> >> something terribly wrong.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Tim Bish
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Tim Bish
> twitter: @tabish121
> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>
> --
Clebert Suconic

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message