activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Paging
Date Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:01:25 GMT
What was your change ?

Pull request ? :)
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:35 AM nigro_franz <nigro.fra@gmail.com> wrote:

> The GC free paging (on the write path at least) seems to perform pretty
> good:
>
> This is without using it:
>
> Producer Throughput: 42153 ops/sec
> Consumer Throughput: 42453 ops/sec
> EndToEnd Throughput: 40818 ops/sec
> EndToEnd SERVICE-TIME Latencies distribution in MICROSECONDS
> mean             852567.48
> min              517996.54
> 50.00%           843055.10
> 90.00%          1098907.65
> 99.00%          1384120.32
> 99.90%          1451229.18
> 99.99%          1493172.22
> max             1493172.22
> count              1000000
>
> This is using it:
>
> Producer Throughput: 49744 ops/sec
> Consumer Throughput: 49739 ops/sec
> EndToEnd Throughput: 49738 ops/sec
> EndToEnd SERVICE-TIME Latencies distribution in MICROSECONDS
> mean               4948.23
> min                  92.16
> 50.00%             2162.69
> 90.00%            11337.73
> 99.00%            42991.62
> 99.90%           115867.65
> 99.99%           121110.53
> max              122159.10
> count              1000000
>
> The throughput is increased by 25% and the latencies are far better (less
> GC
> and shorter ones).
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Paging-tp4724085p4724761.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
-- 
Clebert Suconic

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message