activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Fabio Gomes dos Santos <supergr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: What is the current status and plans for the web-console?
Date Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:42:31 GMT
right!

Zabbix + zabbix-java-gateway + http://github.com/supergrilo/pyjmx-discovery
+ grafana

To execute commands jmxcmd:

```
/movile/jdk8/bin/java -jar /movile/artemis-data/bin/jmxcmd.jar -
localhost:8100
'org.apache.activemq.artemis:brokerName="artemis-diveo",module=JMS,name="
MOVILE.QUEUE.NAME",serviceType=Queue,type=Broker' 'pause=true
```

soon a article about that "ecosystem".

2017-02-17 14:20 GMT-02:00 Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>:

> @CShannon: I saw a few guys from Brazil (Right, @Fabio?), implementing
> an awesome interface on top of Artemis using Grafana:
>
>
> https://github.com/grafana/grafana
>
>
> Pretty impressive.  :O
>
>
>
> If we build a separate repo, we could have scripts for things like
> Grafana, or other tools like this!!!! It would rock!!!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Christopher Shannon
> <christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Agreed, having a good user experience should be a high priority and
> having
> > some way to configure a broker and monitor a broker at runtime that is
> user
> > friendly is ideal.  If the web console can rely on something like a REST
> > service and JMX for data then it will also allow other tools to be built
> to
> > help with management.  Besides a web console I also find a command line
> > interface based console to be really useful.  Being able to quickly run
> > commands from a shell to do things such as make configuration changes or
> > view metrics is useful because it is fast and can be easily scripted.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for restoring this discussion.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> >> clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > What about start doing it right after Artemis 2.0.0 is out? Aim it to
> >> > 2.1.0 (on Artemis, being compatible with AMQ5 (still a question mark
> >> > on how to do it.. but I"m taking this is a requirement)).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Christopher Shannon
> >> > <christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > Yes there seemed to be some consensus to build a plugin hosted here
> at
> >> > > Apache or to build a new console altogether to support 5.x and
> Artemis.
> >> > > And we would keep the existing console until then.
> >> >
> >> Yes!
> >>
> >> The console is something I am really passionate about.  In my opinion
> user
> >> experience is the number one priority and the lack of any form of
> console
> >> in Artemis is just a disaster.  We're really missing a trick here as I
> >> think we could build something fantastic for both ActiveMQ 5.x and
> Artemis.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > > However, the hold up has always been finding people who have time
to
> >> work
> >> > > on it and want to work on it.  If someone wants to create a repo and
> >> > start
> >> > > working on it that would probably help to get others involved.
> >> >
> >> I'm more than happy to take this on and get a repository created and
> put a
> >> basic framework in place.  This should get the ball rolling.
> >>
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > On Feb 17, 2017, at 8:52 AM, Clebert Suconic <
> >> > clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Christian Schneider
> >> > >> > <chris@die-schneider.net> wrote:
> >> > >> >> I have read the old threads about the web console.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> If I understood correctly then we would like to get rid
of the
> >> > current
> >> > >> >> activemq web console but need a replacement. There is
hawt.io
> >> which
> >> > >> >> functionally would work but which is not compatible from
a
> >> community
> >> > >> >> standpoint.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > My understand was: as long as it looked like an apache console,
> and
> >> > >> > not a commercial product belonging to any company it would
be ok.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >> *AND* all of the ActiveMQ/Artemis related bits are written and
> >> > maintained
> >> > >> here at Apache as part of this community.  How the queues and
> brokers
> >> > and
> >> > >> such are presented to the user is completely under the control
of
> this
> >> > >> community.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> In other words: we don’t take the activemq plugin or whatever
they
> >> have
> >> > >> and use it as is. (Unless they want to donate it to this community)
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> Daniel Kulp
> >> > >> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> >> > >> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Clebert Suconic
> >> >
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>



-- 
Fábio Santos
supergrilo@gmail.com
<http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message