activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Rework NMS.AMQP
Date Wed, 15 Feb 2017 17:45:34 GMT
of course I mistyped git as github on my previous message.


apache git projects are mirrored on github, but the main repo is
always the apache one. Just as a reference to make sure my typo won't
confuse you.

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
> how I would do regarding legal:
>
>
> i would create a JIRA on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL
>
>
> And I would follow up with a [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list,
> referencing the JIRA.
>
>
> Pointing out the dependency you will include, the license and the
> source of the project.
>
>
> I don't foresee any issues.. but it would be nice to have you on board
> with that discussion.
>
>
>
>
>
> I really think we should convert the NMS as a github project. I have
> seen more interest on projects around github these days. (TBH I don't
> even remember how to use SVN, git by itself is another + on building
> community).
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Duane Pauls <duane.pauls@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for the feedback.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:03 PM Jim Gomes <jgomes@apache.org> wrote:
>>> > As you point out, the licensing seems to be compatible, but maybe a quick
>>> > review from Apache legal might be a good idea since the intent is to
>>> > re-integrate it into the NMS codebase as an official project.
>>>
>>
>> Would you be able to explain how I'd do this (or refer me to some
>> instructions)?
>>
>>
>>
>>> >
>>> > The NMS code is in Subversion, and not in Git.  Here is the repository
>>> URL:
>>> >
>>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/activemq-dotnet/
>>> Apache.NMS.AMQP/trunk
>>> > .
>>> > It does not need to be ported to Git in order to create a new AMQP
>>> provider
>>> > implementation.
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> It would make it easier to contribute thought. PRs is a perfect way to
>>> start with contributions.
>>
>>
>> From my point of view we wouldn't strictly require a conversion to git.
>> But I agree PR's would simplify reviews and contributions.
>>
>>
>>
>>> > > you could also include ActiveMQ Artemis to the list of brokers.
>>>
>>
>> I agree it makes sense to add Artemis to the list of brokers.
>>
>>
>>
>>> > > Do you have an idea on how much effort it would take...  do you have
>>> > > any ideas for the initial implementation already?
>>>
>>
>> One of my colleagues, Chris Morgan has spent more time than I have at this
>> stage scoping the effort.  We think this will likely take a few months.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Duane
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Mime
View raw message