activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.x stream
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:06:23 GMT
I guess it's just simplification? one is in seconds, the other is in minutes?

It seems something we should fix.. but it needs to be done on a major
release. (it would break minor updates).

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Justin Bertram <jbertram@apache.org> wrote:
> What's the use-case for needing to "align" <slow-consumer-threshold> and <slow-consumer-check-period>?
>
>
> Justin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jiri Danek" <jdanek@redhat.com>
> To: dev@activemq.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 3:26:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.x stream
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to open discussion around this topic, does anyone have any
>> suggestions, or can think of anything that is needed before we go ahead
>> with a major release? This is the perfect time to do anything that could
>> break APIs, drop deprecated methods support, break data format etc...
>>
>
> What about changing units on config option
>
> <slow-consumer-threshold>100</slow-consumer-threshold>
>
> currently it is in messages/second, I suggest using messages/minute, to
> align it with
>
> <slow-consumer-check-period>5</slow-consumer-check-period>
>
> which is in minutes.
>
> --
> Jiří Daněk



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Mime
View raw message