activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ Artemis 2.x stream
Date Thu, 09 Feb 2017 14:22:42 GMT
... also.. it would be nice to have a new webiste frontpage by the
time we are 2.0 on Artemis... :/


On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am doing some refactoring on the encoding of messages...
>
>
> Currently ServerMessage and ClientMessage are too tight with Queue and
> the core client, requiring us to always convert messages through the
> core message.
>
>
> That is, if you receive a Message in OpenWire, it is converted back to
> the core-message through the converters and when a client comes, it
> will convert back to openwire. (same will go through any other
> protocols).
>
>
>
> I have started this on a personal branch, and I believe I will done in
> 2 weeks and half time, making good progress...
>
>
>
> I will open a dev/DISCUSS thread some time (I believe I had started
> one last year already).
>
>
>
> clebert
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Martyn Taylor <mtaylor@redhat.com> wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> As discussed in a previous thread [1] Artemis master has had a major bump
>> (due to major model refactor).
>>
>> The great news is that the new model is more flexible and lends itself well
>> to 5.x features like Virtual Topics as well as being consistent across all
>> protocols.  The not so good news is that this work required API breakages,
>> hence the major version bump.).  This refactor work (mostly around the
>> addressing scheme [2]) is now completed.
>>
>> The code base is now in a stable state, and as such, I'd like to start
>> thinking about doing a release off of master as an Apache Artemis 2.0.0 to
>> get the new changes into the hands of users.
>>
>> I'd like to open discussion around this topic, does anyone have any
>> suggestions, or can think of anything that is needed before we go ahead
>> with a major release? This is the perfect time to do anything that could
>> break APIs, drop deprecated methods support, break data format etc...
>>
>> Cheers
>> Martyn
>>
>> [1]
>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Artemis-addressing-improvements-JMS-component-removal-and-potential-2-0-0-td4719262.html
>>
>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-780
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic



-- 
Clebert Suconic

Mime
View raw message