activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From dudaerich <...@git.apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] activemq-artemis pull request #1044: ARTEMIS-995 Bulk of test fixes
Date Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:26:19 GMT
Github user dudaerich commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1044#discussion_r102962674
  
    --- Diff: artemis-junit/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/junit/MultipleEmbeddedActiveMQResourcesTest.java
---
    @@ -38,6 +38,11 @@
        static final String ASSERT_RECEIVED_FORMAT = "Message should have been received from
%s";
        static final String ASSERT_COUNT_FORMAT = "Unexpected message count in queue %s";
     
    +   static {
    +      ThreadLeakCheckRule.addKownThread("MemoryPoolMXBean notification dispatcher");
    --- End diff --
    
    This was already reported on [HORNETQ-1206](https://issues.jboss.org/browse/HORNETQ-1206)
and they argued that these threads are not managed by broker itself. They are created by IBM
JDK.
    I don't think we can kill some threads but I am not sure.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Mime
View raw message