activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] distribute binary in .deb and .rpm
Date Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:29:32 GMT
Hi Fabio,

did you manage to make any progress on this? I’d be interested to help out.

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
http://sensatic.net/about

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I have asked the apache infra how we could make rpm and .deb releases
> (As Robbie pointed out).
>
> I don't really mind which way we choose. as long it's easier to maintain.
>
>
> It sounds the standard way would be the second option as you suggest.
> why don't you start with that? keep the scripts on a directory such
> artemis-linux-distros.. and I will wait input from infra on how to
> release and sign those.. we can then make more changes.
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Fabio Gomes dos Santos
> <supergrilo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > About the packaging method...
> >
> > If the second way are chosen, i can contribute with the project. Putting
> > the hands-on...
> > For the first, all i can do, is write the test for the binary and help
> with
> > the patterns.
> >
> > if we want to see Artemis officially on debian or centos, the second one
> is
> > the best choose.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-12-12 18:04 GMT-02:00 Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> I know the infra team and some projects have some hosting on bintray
> >> (https://bintray.com/apache/), and that can host .deb and .rpm.
> >> Whether its used by projects to do that, and what any process around
> >> that would be if they do, I'm not sure. Perhaps worth asking infra.
> >>
> >> On 12 December 2016 at 17:03, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > I couldn't find any information about rpms on apache.org
> >> >
> >> > Anyone have any information?
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Clebert Suconic
> >> > <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Having a rpm and .deb is a great idea.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Anyone knows how the release and distribution process would work for
> >> those
> >> >> including signing?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> I will do some research on Apache website later today.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:16 AM Fabio Gomes dos Santos <
> >> supergrilo@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hi!
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> We have two ways to do that:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 1 - Using a plugin on maven:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> http://www.mojohaus.org/rpm-maven-plugin/
> >> >>>
> >> >>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/deb-maven-plugin
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 2 - Using the default way of each distribution (using .spec)
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Fedora/RHEL: https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Debian: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Packaging
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The packagecloud.io has plans to opensource project, but a simple
> s3
> >> can
> >> >>>
> >> >>> provide a mirror for distribution.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> what you think  about?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I think this will provide more visibility to the project
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Fábio Santos
> >> >>>
> >> >>> supergrilo@gmail.com
> >> >>>
> >> >>> <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Clebert Suconic
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Fábio Santos
> > supergrilo@gmail.com
> > <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message