Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFitrpRvY0Su6=cpZWnfFnMnvkEAGB4YgWikgvSu-vFsLAJPpw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN0DB6Pk8OSDj0hbZjcgQWTp7XFt=HAADH-2MMcE3GCoxyCprw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKF+bsoPQxfGNKv_MzP7dEfs1J+5xMc=T2EnqdZrDJ-5hdJhkA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKF+bsp8cf7M==9_WXoCAs4=xDwRDXoL_hmtuqa5G6PvwRf+fQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFitrpRvY0Su6=cpZWnfFnMnvkEAGB4YgWikgvSu-vFsLAJPpw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fabio Gomes dos Santos <supergrilo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 23:08:32 -0200
Message-ID: <CAN0DB6OnFEh4A8sNFAPsWbO1c=_pcmJfAivCbEWdhcr=tE734w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] distribute binary in .deb and .rpm
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c074226caa95905440cac85
archived-at: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 01:08:37 -0000

--94eb2c074226caa95905440cac85
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

About the packaging method...

If the second way are chosen, i can contribute with the project. Putting
the hands-on...
For the first, all i can do, is write the test for the binary and help with
the patterns.

if we want to see Artemis officially on debian or centos, the second one is
the best choose.


2016-12-12 18:04 GMT-02:00 Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>:

> I know the infra team and some projects have some hosting on bintray
> (https://bintray.com/apache/), and that can host .deb and .rpm.
> Whether its used by projects to do that, and what any process around
> that would be if they do, I'm not sure. Perhaps worth asking infra.
>
> On 12 December 2016 at 17:03, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I couldn't find any information about rpms on apache.org
> >
> > Anyone have any information?
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Clebert Suconic
> > <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Having a rpm and .deb is a great idea.
> >>
> >>
> >> Anyone knows how the release and distribution process would work for
> those
> >> including signing?
> >>
> >>
> >> I will do some research on Apache website later today.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:16 AM Fabio Gomes dos Santos <
> supergrilo@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> We have two ways to do that:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 1 - Using a plugin on maven:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> http://www.mojohaus.org/rpm-maven-plugin/
> >>>
> >>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/deb-maven-plugin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2 - Using the default way of each distribution (using .spec)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Fedora/RHEL: https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/
> >>>
> >>> Debian: https://wiki.debian.org/Java/Packaging
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The packagecloud.io has plans to opensource project, but a simple s3
> can
> >>>
> >>> provide a mirror for distribution.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> what you think  about?
> >>>
> >>> I think this will provide more visibility to the project
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> F=C3=A1bio Santos
> >>>
> >>> supergrilo@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>> <http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
>


--=20
F=C3=A1bio Santos
supergrilo@gmail.com
<http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>

--94eb2c074226caa95905440cac85--