activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Gomes <jgo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] LevelDB deprecation
Date Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:48:09 GMT
No objections. I was never clear on what advantages LevelDB was supposed to
offer anyway.

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016, 3:45 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Seems like a good idea to me.
>
> On 15 November 2016 at 11:45, Christopher Shannon
> <christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I just wanted to ask what people think about officially deprecating
> LevelDB
> > in our 5.x broker and update our documentation to say that it is no
> longer
> > recommended.  We can leave it in the code base for people who are still
> > using it but discourage its use.
> >
> > The main reason is that KahaDB continues to be the main focus where bugs
> > are fixed and not much attention is paid to LevelDB. There seems to be
> > several issues with corruption (especially with replication) so I don't
> > think it should be a recommended store unless the stability is sorted
> out.
> > Unfortunately nearly every Jira reported against LevelDB goes ignored.
> >
> > Now that Artemis exists and supports replication I think the focus should
> > be primarily on making Artemis the focus for users who need a replicated
> > store or to encourage the use of something like a shared file system
> > master/slave setup.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message