Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKF+bsrja2Vv87jd5CpGXD9Vw+fAwjz9vJyX0AMUOd3uijjTnw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKF+bsrja2Vv87jd5CpGXD9Vw+fAwjz9vJyX0AMUOd3uijjTnw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "John D. Ament" <johndament@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:09:51 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOqetn_ysNR1Hk1Ti9TPnke4-SQ12ojBiLE_T=Nufu4tRis=qw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HEADS-UP/DISCUSS Artemis 1.4.1
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0b908a5a8efb053f10f855
archived-at: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:10:05 -0000

--94eb2c0b908a5a8efb053f10f855
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Is there a changelog of whats going in? If its all bug fixes, 1.4.1 makes
sense.  if its feature, I would think 1.5.0 is more appropriate.

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:52 AM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I want to make a release early next week. (as I have pointed a few weeks
> ago).
>
>
> I will release from master... there are a few new packages added
> around OSGI, but I was still considering calling 1.4.1, and reserve
> 1.5.0 for a few more major features that will change the broker
> itself.
>
>
> If no objections I will call it 1.4.1, but I wouldn't mind calling it
> 1.5.0 if anyone objects.
>

--94eb2c0b908a5a8efb053f10f855--