Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKF+bsptZTaac0LRoUqcQNcD=Km6vHdDLRcTqgKUPuTSqBWr-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKF+bsptZTaac0LRoUqcQNcD=Km6vHdDLRcTqgKUPuTSqBWr-Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Claus Ibsen <claus.ibsen@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:13:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGB5yN==HnTq5w-qtD=q1GBeOzde_32VXeNS9zZ4LQTwKMyWLg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removing aerogear / vertx module
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
archived-at: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 07:19:06 -0000

+1

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Clebert Suconic
<clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are a few modules on Artemis that I feel are a bit defunct. I
> don't really think anyone will be using it:
>
> - aerogear:
>     * It's not working
>     * I am not sure about the status of Aerogear
>     * It's probably better to be integrated the other way around. i.e.
> Aerogear consuming artemis
> - vertx
>    * There are other ways to integrate with vertx. the most obvious is
> through the AMQP bridge. also you could create VertX components in
> Vertx which is more component oriented than a message broker.
>    * It's broken as well, even using a very old version.
>
>
> I will remove these two modules and its tests before the release
> (which I'm still trying to get it out asap.. I just keep looking for
> issues, given my OCD level :) ).. we can always revert from git later
> if we get any real users (I really doubt that).. and then it should be
> proper fixed if anyone is using it.
>
>
> Any objections?


-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2