Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
From: Bennet Schulz <mail@bennet-schulz.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.0 \(3226\))
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] removing aerogear / vertx module
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 07:43:07 +0200
References: <CAKF+bsptZTaac0LRoUqcQNcD=Km6vHdDLRcTqgKUPuTSqBWr-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <CAKF+bsptZTaac0LRoUqcQNcD=Km6vHdDLRcTqgKUPuTSqBWr-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <9AD397EA-67B1-468A-B381-AD15B4E4A656@bennet-schulz.de>
archived-at: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:43:13 -0000

no objections.

> On 28 Oct 2016, at 06:56, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> There are a few modules on Artemis that I feel are a bit defunct. I
> don't really think anyone will be using it:
>=20
> - aerogear:
>    * It's not working
>    * I am not sure about the status of Aerogear
>    * It's probably better to be integrated the other way around. i.e.
> Aerogear consuming artemis
> - vertx
>   * There are other ways to integrate with vertx. the most obvious is
> through the AMQP bridge. also you could create VertX components in
> Vertx which is more component oriented than a message broker.
>   * It's broken as well, even using a very old version.
>=20
>=20
> I will remove these two modules and its tests before the release
> (which I'm still trying to get it out asap.. I just keep looking for
> issues, given my OCD level :) ).. we can always revert from git later
> if we get any real users (I really doubt that).. and then it should be
> proper fixed if anyone is using it.
>=20
>=20
> Any objections?