activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Require Java 8 for 5.15 and Artemis
Date Wed, 19 Oct 2016 19:24:30 GMT
But then no one can claim Artemis is 6.x... 😂

On Oct 19, 2016 15:17, "Clebert Suconic" <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:

> ok, lets do it then. +1
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Christopher Shannon
> <christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well we do need 1.8 so we can use Camel 2.18 and fix OSGi stuff in 5.15.
> > And I figured it would be a bit odd if 5.x upgraded but Artemis didn't
> > upgrade.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Clebert Suconic <
> clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> man... I'm messed up today.. wrong thread ... (on my previous message)
> >>
> >> anyways... If we can keep 1.7 for now and move it when we need it?
> >>
> >> I'm already using JDK 1.8 for dev, and I believe everybody is... all
> >> the CIs are on JDK 1.8, but from time to time I check on 1.7 just to
> >> be sure.
> >>
> >>
> >> My main concern is with clients.. from time to time I see users
> >> needing JDK 1.OOOOLD on clients.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Clebert Suconic
> >> <clebert.suconic@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Actually, this was originally written by @CSchneider :)  ...
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Christopher Shannon
> >> > <christopher.l.shannon@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> With the release of Camel 2.18 I thought now was a good time to
> propose
> >> >> this.  I think for the ActiveMQ 5.15 release we should bump the
> required
> >> >> Java version to Java 8 as this will allow us to use Camel 2.18 so we
> can
> >> >> finally fix our OSGi module and drop the deprecated Spring DM
> entirely.
> >> >> This release probably won't go out until sometime next year and by
> that
> >> >> time JDK 9 should be either released or close to being released and
> JDK
> >> 7
> >> >> will have had its last public update nearly 2 years ago.
> >> >>
> >> >> Also, I figure we might as well do the same thing for Artemis.
> >> >>
> >> >> Any objections or reasons to stick with Java 7?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Clebert Suconic
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Clebert Suconic
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message