activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Fabio Gomes dos Santos <supergr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Removing the Web Console
Date Fri, 07 Oct 2016 23:11:05 GMT
TL;DR

but i believe you will appreciate this screenshots
i have used zabbix to collect metrics and generate alerts, and used grafana
like a passive artemis dashboard.

Basically grafana use zabbix like a data store via api.

i have plan to write a article about how do that soon



​



2016-10-07 19:54 GMT-03:00 Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>:

> a consolidated repo for AMQ and Artemis might be useful for other
> stuff as well. not just the web console.
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:49 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > I think I just saw two great ideas:
> >
> > - A consolidated web console that is usable by both ActiveMQ and Artemis.
> > - It should be an independent repository/utility.
> >
> > I think all of the discussions are happening on a ML, but realistically
> if
> > we're ready to start writing down some code, we need some of those
> > utilities in place.  Since PRs are mirrored to the MLs that would work,
> but
> > I would hate to see it baked into one of the existing repos to make that
> > happen.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:41 PM Jim Gomes <jgomes@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I was under the impression that all Apache development discussions
> occur on
> >> the email list. This is for legal and policy reasons. Please correct me
> if
> >> I'm wrong.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016, 9:43 AM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I think this is pretty straightforward:
> >> >
> >> > i - it should relay on JMX or jolokia.. A common thing between both
> >> > Artemis and ActiveMQ
> >> >
> >> > ii - it should manage at least a single broker.. with some metrics...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > iii - anything beyond that will just be a collaboration over the code.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The best way to discuss this IMO would be through a Pull Request..
> >> > someone send an initial draft.. we can have some **technical**
> >> > discussion over of PR, and commit it as version 1... then
> >> > collaboratively this could be increased just as with anything else.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I think we are clear from the previous discussions... and that's a
> >> > request I am making here, probably the third time... lets CTRL-Alt-Del
> >> > and start fresh... The issues we had are clear... and I see everybody
> >> > with a single goal here.. to have an integrated console that looks
> >> > like an Apache project, pretty and neat.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Once someone put a first version, we can only improve it from there.
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbarcea@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > I would suggest discussing the goals for such a console first. Is
it
> >> > > intended to monitory just one broker instance or a whole network of
> >> > brokers?
> >> > > Should it manage just the brokers or other services? Should it rely
> on
> >> > JMX
> >> > > or something else?
> >> > >
> >> > > Then one can think about reusing and/or improving something that's
> >> > available
> >> > > or some other solution.
> >> > >
> >> > > The way this discuss goes, sounds to me like trying to push again
> for
> >> > > something that was rejected in the past and I suspect will not go
> >> > anywhere.
> >> > >
> >> > > My $0.02,
> >> > > Hadrian
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On 10/07/2016 06:41 AM, Martyn Taylor wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> +1 on improving/adding a console.  Providing a console out of
the
> box
> >> > is a
> >> > >> massive win for user experience imo and something that I feel
> Artemis
> >> > >> would
> >> > >> greatly benefit from.  Whether it's HawtIO or something else we
> should
> >> > >> make
> >> > >> every effort to standardise across both 5.x and Artemis.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Clebert Suconic
> >> > >> <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, John D. Ament <
> >> johndament@apache.org>
> >> > >>> wrote:
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> @Hiram
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> The website branding says otherwise (take a look at the
top right
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> corner).
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> That symbol on the top is just a link to the following:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> "Like hawtio? It’s part of a community of Red Hat projects.
Learn
> >> more
> >> > >>> about Red Hat and our open source communities:"
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>  No other implications from what I see.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Clebert Suconic
> >> >
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Clebert Suconic
>



-- 
Fábio Santos
supergrilo@gmail.com
<http://br.linkedin.com/pub/f%C3%A1bio-santos/1b/20/422>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/related (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message