Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: chubrilo@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAOqetn8fKgT9GAjYKD5eu4gC_++8b-4stSc-q7RZ=o_Z=agG8g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOqetn_M1G1CcWFCCFJHYbuv0Yq0NkwvB3gP_PXhf9CRbkqemA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOqetn-ijikj2hGVSmD6ho65_mpkNDdyKAzb4204U2AtHoek-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKF+bsqMQQ85ipye66NvaL_2E2EMm=Ekr8m2X9Af9STFp-BL3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAOqetn8fKgT9GAjYKD5eu4gC_++8b-4stSc-q7RZ=o_Z=agG8g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dejan Bosanac <dejan@nighttale.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 16:45:56 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGeh-pGWaewQWZFpJRfjS2NAoCobjt7WZYTy4bJyHpE5s5_DwA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CDI Backed Client Library for Artemis
To: "dev@activemq.apache.org" <dev@activemq.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c123562708184053903a86b
archived-at: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 14:46:05 -0000

--94eb2c123562708184053903a86b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi guys,

I=E2=80=99m heading out for vacation in an hour, so I won=E2=80=99t be able=
 to take a look
at it immediately. I=E2=80=99ll dig into it as soon as I=E2=80=99m back. Bu=
t, yeah this is
a completely new integration, so it won=E2=80=99t affect any of the existin=
g stuff.


Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
http://sensatic.net/about

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:24 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org> wrote=
:

> That test looks like its focused on Karaf (OSGi) integration.  Definitely
> something that should be there.  There's one guy I know who does OSGi and
> CDI really well, but the market just isn't there.  Both leverage JSR-330
> (AtInject) but ultimately are two different service models.
>
> This being its own JAR shouldn't impact any of that.
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:16 AM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.co=
m
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Looks really nice.. Very well done.
> >
> > There is a test Dejan wrote for CDI called
> > org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.integration.kara.ArtemisFeatureTest
> >
> > Can you verify the test still works?
> >
> >
> > And how this would affect that Karaf integration?
> >
> >
> > @Dejan can you take a look given you did a lot of work with this before=
?
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 11:11 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > Sorry, meant to link here -
> > > https://github.com/johnament/activemq-artemis/tree/cdi-client
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 11:09 PM John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org=
>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> All,
> > >>
> > >> I wanted to run this POC by you guys to see your thoughts.  Obviousl=
y
> I
> > >> have a mixed background at this point, so it kind of makes sense to
> > bring
> > >> two of my interests together.  I started hacking together a CDI back=
ed
> > >> client against Artemis Core/JMS.  Looking at Artemis and its
> > integrations
> > >> with Vert.x, Aerogear and Spring, it makes sense to support another
> > >> runtime.  In addition, the JMS 2 spec mandates support for some
> > injection
> > >> points via CDI.  I wanted to take it a step further.
> > >>
> > >> - If running locally, bootstrap an embedded server.
> > >> - Connect to a locally running server, or a configured remote cluste=
r.
> > >> - Provide some injection points to work with said server (e.g.
> > >> ConnectionFactory, JMSContext)
> > >>
> > >> I wouldn't call it complete, but I've created a simple POC that does
> > these
> > >> things, which you can find at
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/johnament/activemq-artemis/commit/8430136d9ea648a1f089=
747da434d945de1d7fa2
> > >> I still want to add some XA support, but even this adds a huge step
> > >> forward to be able to connect a simple local process to a remote
> server,
> > >> without needing full containers to do injection points.
> > >>
> > >> So what do you guys think? Worth adding to Artemis?
> > >>
> > >> John
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Clebert Suconic
> >
>

--94eb2c123562708184053903a86b--