activemq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Active MQ Performance
Date Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:58:22 GMT
What version ?

Can you try Artemis ?

On Tuesday, June 14, 2016, ActiveMQ Investigation <
ajay.kumar@winterflood.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am doing some raw performance tests on ActiveMQ to replace SonicMQ (JMS
> based) on C++ side. We have CMS using OpenWire.
> My test has got five Non Durable subscribers on a Topic. When I send 25000
> messages, following happens:
>
> 1. Persistent - It takes 3 times (27sec) more than what it takes on SonicMQ
> (9sec). I need to find out what's causing this delay and how to improve it.
> I understand that publisher will wait until broker comes back to ack
> messages. I am using Auto_ACK. I have looked at SonicMQ settings for IO
> Buffer and socket buffer and do the same for ActiveMQ but no success.
>
>
> 2. Non Persistent - This one is faster as fire and forget but messages are
> sometime 2 seconds in flight on subscriber which is unacceptable to our use
> case. I tried setting prefetch etc thinking it's slow consumer but no
> success.
>
> Hardware is same for both. ActiveMQ install is default installation. I am
> going through performance tuning guide mentioned in the forum but any quick
> clues / areas to look at will be appreciated.
>
> Sorry if my query is too subjective but I want to find out where ActiveMQ
> is
> taking time and why. I have done raw tests just using stomp on ActiveMQ (No
> CPP involved) and it was way faster as compared to Sonic. So I suspect, I
> need to tweak some settings which may be causing it.
>
>
> Thanks
> AJ
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Performance-tp4712952.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>


-- 
Clebert Suconic

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message