Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C782009C5 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 20:31:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D4400160A16; Mon, 16 May 2016 18:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AB82160131 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 20:31:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 65665 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2016 18:31:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@activemq.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@activemq.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@activemq.apache.org Received: (qmail 65654 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2016 18:31:40 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2016 18:31:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id ABF2C1800A4 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 18:31:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.487 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.487 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URI_HEX=1.313, URI_TRY_3LD=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jYlKX9kI8e5y for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 18:31:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 58B595FB73 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 18:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mjoe.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.57]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9718D2A9857DE for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 10:55:46 -0700 (PDT) From: abhijith To: dev@activemq.apache.org Message-ID: <1463421346124-4712011.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <192067061.3280224.1463423146721.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <1463246436100-4711941.post@n4.nabble.com> <103528439.3205320.1463406229914.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <1463416864958-4712005.post@n4.nabble.com> <1463419424307-4712008.post@n4.nabble.com> <192067061.3280224.1463423146721.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Artemis] Bug in ServerLocatorImpl.createSessionFactory() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Mon, 16 May 2016 18:31:42 -0000 Not concerned about performance as it can be handled by using persistent connections. It is only the initial handshake which takes time, which is acceptable during boot up time. It is the management of keys and other resources required to do TLS. By using proxy server, we can centralize certificate and key management and not distribute it across multiple applications including message broker. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-Bug-in-ServerLocatorImpl-createSessionFactory-tp4711941p4712011.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.